Ugo Foscolo and Jacopo Ortis Between the Life and the Poiesis: Reflections about the Self-Translation

Authors

  • Karine Simoni Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Língua e Literatura Estrangeiras, Pós-Graduação em Estudos da Tradução, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18309/anp.v1i44.1149

Keywords:

Self-writing, Self-translation, Ugo Foscolo, Jacopo Ortis, Implied author

Abstract

This article aims to consider the interconnections between the self-writing and the self-translation which is focused on Ugo Foscolo’s experiences (1778-1827). The objective of this study is to analyze the relation between the author Ugo Foscolo and his character Jacopo Ortis from the novel published in 1817 called Ultimelettere di Jacopo Ortis [The last letters of Jacopo Ortis]. It is taken as a corpus the said novel and the letters that Foscolo sent to Antonietta Fagnani Arese between 1801 and 1803. The first complete version of the novel UltimeLettere di Jacopo Ortis was published during this period. Furthermore, a comparative reading reveals characteristics in common in the writing of Foscolo and the protagonist of his novel. This conclusion is based on the exchange of letters between Foscolo and Arese and the letters written by Jacopo Ortis and addressed to Lorenzo Alderani.  For this contrast it was used the implied author concept of Wayne Booth (1980) and the considerations about translation described by Marco Lucchesi (2016).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Karine Simoni, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Língua e Literatura Estrangeiras, Pós-Graduação em Estudos da Tradução, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil

Departamento de Língua e Literatura Estrangeiras

Centro de Comunicação e Expressão

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Published

2018-04-29

How to Cite

Simoni, K. (2018). Ugo Foscolo and Jacopo Ortis Between the Life and the Poiesis: Reflections about the Self-Translation. Revista Da Anpoll, 1(44), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.18309/anp.v1i44.1149